Skip to content



Astro website development icon

Astro websites that ship almost no JavaScript

Content sites don't need an app framework. Astro renders your pages to plain HTML, hydrates only the components that need it, and leaves your Core Web Vitals alone.



Companies of all sizes trust Roboto Studio





Static speed, app-grade interactivity

Islands architecture

Most content sites ship an application framework's worth of JavaScript to render pages that are, honestly, documents. Astro flips that default. Every page renders to plain HTML on the server, and JavaScript is opt-in per component: the search box hydrates, the ten paragraphs around it don't. Your visitors get pages that load instantly on hotel wifi, and your Core Web Vitals stop being a quarterly remediation project.

We build Astro sites the same way we build everything else: structured content first. Your pages come from Sanity, Contentful, or MDX collections in your own repository, so editors keep a real workflow and nothing about the frontend is welded to the content. When a page needs genuine interactivity, we drop in an island built with React, and the rest of the site stays static.



When we recommend Astro, and when we don't

An honest default

Astro is our recommendation when the site is overwhelmingly content: marketing sites, documentation, editorial publications, blogs that have outgrown their CMS's frontend. It is not our recommendation for logged-in products, dashboards, or sites where personalisation drives every page, because that's application territory and Next.js handles it better.

You shouldn't have to arbitrate a framework debate to buy a website. Next.js is our daily driver and Astro shares its content-first playbook, so we hold no framework loyalty and we'll tell you in the first call which one your requirements actually point to. Quite often the Astro answer is also the cheaper one to build and the cheaper one to run.



Content-first builds we've shipped





Burning questions

Considering Astro?

The questions we get asked when teams are weighing Astro against an app framework.

What is Astro and when is it the right choice?

Astro is a web framework built for content-heavy sites: marketing pages, blogs, documentation, editorial publications. It renders everything to static HTML by default and only ships JavaScript for the components you explicitly mark as interactive. If most of your site is content and a handful of widgets, Astro is usually the right call. If your site is mostly application, it isn't.

Astro or Next.js, which should we pick?

Our honest rule: Next.js when the site has real application logic, personalisation, or heavy interactive surfaces; Astro when the site is overwhelmingly content with a few interactive islands. Next.js is what we ship week in, week out, and Astro shares its content-first playbook, so the recommendation follows your requirements rather than our preference. We'll tell you which one fits in the first call, and it's often the less expensive answer.

Does Astro work with a headless CMS?

Yes, and that's how we build it. Astro pairs cleanly with Sanity and Contentful: your editors keep a real editorial workflow, and the site rebuilds or revalidates when content changes. Content collections also make on-disk MDX a first-class option for teams who want content in the repo.

What are islands and why do they matter?

An island is a single interactive component, like a search box or a pricing calculator, hydrated on an otherwise static page. Instead of shipping a whole application bundle to render mostly static content, Astro ships JavaScript only for those islands. The result is less code over the wire and Core Web Vitals that hold up under real traffic.

How does Astro help SEO and AI search?

Every page is fully rendered HTML with no client-side rendering gap, which is exactly what search crawlers and answer engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity want to read. Combined with fast load times and structured data baked into the templates, Astro sites are easy to index and easy to cite. That's the same crawlability work behind our AI SEO service.

Can you migrate our existing site to Astro?

Yes. An Astro migration follows the same URL-map and 301 playbook as every CMS replatform we run: each legacy URL mapped, rankings carried over, and your content brought along or remodelled as part of the move, whether it currently lives in WordPress, Webflow, or a legacy framework.

Can Astro handle interactive features and apps?

Within reason. Islands can be React, Svelte, or Vue components, so carts, search, filtering, and forms are all comfortable territory. When the interactive surface grows into a genuine application, dashboards, logged-in product, complex state, we'll steer you to Next.js instead of stretching Astro past what it's good at.

Who maintains the site after launch?

Either your team or ours. Astro sites are deliberately simple to run: content edits go through the CMS, and the codebase is small enough for one developer to hold in their head. If you'd rather not staff it, our retainer covers upgrades, new sections, and incident response.



From the blog





Ready for a faster content site?

Tell us what you're publishing. A marketing site that's outgrown its builder, docs that need to load instantly, or a content platform where the app framework is doing nothing but slowing you down: we'll scope it in a 20-minute call and tell you whether Astro fits, including when the answer is Next.js instead.

Talk to us about your Astro build


Get in touch

Tell us what you're building. We reply within one working day. Jono or someone on the team picks up every message personally.

By sending this you agree to our privacy policy. We only use your details to reply.