Skip to content




Contentstack logo
Strapi logo

From Contentstack to Strapi

We are the Contentstack to Strapi migration experts

Last verified:


The process

How we migrate from Contentstack to Strapi

  1. 01

    Access and gating audit

    First we check the existing Contentstack and see whether the data is clean enough to move straight over to Strapi, and plan around any auth walls or bot protection in the way.

  2. 02

    Rendering assessment and extraction

    Then we work out how Contentstack renders its pages and pull the content out, even without CMS access.

  3. 03

    AI-assisted sanitization

    Everything extracted runs through our sanitization pipeline, which flags slop, normalizes structure, and leaves us clean content to work with.

  4. 04

    Content-model design with the client

    Before anything moves, we agree the Strapi content model with you, shaped around how your editors actually work.

  5. 05

    Transform and soft-migrate

    We transform the content to the agreed schema and run a full dry run, so mappings and edge cases prove out before production.

  6. 06

    Execute the real migration

    Once the dry run is clean, everything moves into Strapi in one controlled cutover.

  7. 07

    Redirect mapping and throttled sitemap submission

    Every old URL gets mapped to its new home with the right redirect, so rankings and link equity survive the move.

  8. 08

    Agentic-browser QA

    Finally, automated browsers sweep the new site for data issues, design regressions, and missing SEO signals.

  9. Ready when you are. We'll bring the moving boxes.Start my migration


Challenges with Contentstack

Key pain points

Contentstack comes with a hefty price tag and an even heftier learning curve. You don’t just "spin it up," you architect it, model it, train teams, fight through workflows, and hope your budget survives the onboarding. The editor can drag when the content tree gets big, and the visual builder starts feeling like it's running a marathon with ankle weights.

Pricing is also locked behind sales calls and enterprise paperwork. Good luck, if you want to switch platforms later. The custom setups and integrations turn migration into a full-blown project. Even with strong APIs, a lot of "advanced" tasks still need bespoke dev work, meaning you’ll rely on specialists whether you like it or not.

Help me migrate


Steep learning curve

Steep learning curve

Even seasoned teams need time to get comfortable. Content modeling and workflows aren’t "plug and play," expect onboarding sessions and a couple of headaches.

Grayscale gear with a dark center dot, surrounded by two concentric rings, on a grid background.

Complex initial setup

Getting everything wired up the way you want takes real developer hours. This isn’t a "spin it up on a Friday" CMS.

Performance lags in editor

Performance lags in editor

Large content models and lots of entries can make the editor feel sluggish, especially when teams scale up.

Dark code editor displaying abstract lines of code and binary numbers.

Limited self-service customization

Anything beyond the basics tends to require a developer. Marketers won’t be bending this platform to their will alone.

Editor usability concerns

Editor usability concerns

The visual builder is powerful but can get overwhelming fast, especially with deep nesting or complex blocks.

Dark themed web development interface showing a component palette with Vue and React icons, and a lightning bolt in a preview pane.

Content modeling complexity

You’ll spend time architecting your content upfront. If your team isn’t used to strict modeling, brace yourself.



Benefits of Strapi

Key advantages

If you’re the kind of team that likes to get your hands dirty with real code instead of fighting a bloated enterprise UI, Strapi will feel like home. It’s open-source, customisable, and developer-centric. You get full access to the codebase, no licensing paywalls, and the freedom to shape your CMS exactly the way you want it.

It is flexible. You can use React, Vue, Angular, mobile apps, and smart displays to push content. And despite being dev-leaning, it still gives you GUI-based drag-and-drop schema generation, which means you can spin up content models fast without digging into JSON files every five minutes.

Start my migration


Strapi has Node.js driven architecture

Node.js driven architecture

Built on Node.js, Strapi plugs straight into the modern JavaScript ecosystem. If your team already lives in JS-land, Strapi fits right in.

Easy frontend framework integration

Easy frontend framework integration

Pick your poison React, Vue, or Angular. Strapi plays nicely with all of them, making it easy to ship content.

Highly modular approach

Highly modular approach

Every part of Strapi is built like Lego. Add what you need, remove what you don’t, and customise endlessly. It’s great if you love building your CMS exactly your way instead of wrestling with rigid templates.

RESTful API flexibility

RESTful API flexibility

Out of the box, Strapi generates clean REST APIs that are easy to consume, easy to extend, and easy to customise. Ideal for multi-channel content delivery without rewriting half your backend.

Supports GraphQL APIs

Supports GraphQL APIs

With its GraphQL plugin, you get structured queries, reduced over-fetching, and a nicer developer experience with zero hacking required.

Flexible content management

Flexible content management

Strapi lets you model content however you want, from simple pages to complex, relational structures. Combined with a drag-and-drop schema builder, it gives teams full control without feeling boxed in.





Common questions

Contentstack to Strapi migration FAQs

Answers to the most common questions about Contentstack to Strapi migration

Contentstack doesn't publish pricing, which is standard for enterprise DXP platforms and frustrating for everyone else. Based on what we've seen, expect the entry point for a small team to start around $3,000-$5,000/month, with enterprise contracts landing in the $50,000-$150,000+ per year range depending on API usage, regions, and seats. Implementation costs run separately and typically require 8-16 weeks of developer time. If you're comparing against Contentful or Sanity at the enterprise level, Contentstack is generally in the same ballpark as Contentful but significantly more expensive than Sanity for comparable functionality.


Get in touch

Tell us what you're building. We reply within one working day. Jono or someone on the team picks up every message personally.

By sending this you agree to our privacy policy. We only use your details to reply.